On Friday, August 13, 2010, 1:05:16 PM, Kevin wrote: > Jon Ciesla wrote: >> My understanding of the SIG concept was that they were groups of people >> who were self-organizing around a particular theme to further that theme >> in Fedora, i.e. Games, Live Upgrade, KDE, etc. > Right, but that makes them naturally the best bodies to make decisions > related to those respective themes. > Kevin Kofler It seems to me that "best" depends on the point of view of the person in question, and the outcome of a given decision. The FireFox maintainer might well be viewed as best qualified to determine which (if any) distribution-specific patches they want to support over the life of the package. If you say no, then put that maintainer in a "FireFox SIG" and repeat the question. FESCo might well be viewed as best to deal with policies related to updates across _all_ Fedora SIGs and releases, since that one of the tasks they were _ELECTED_ to perform. Seems you think best is one way in one case, and the other way in the other case. It is this inconsistency that folks are trying to bring to your attention. Al -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
