Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You seem to refuse to accept that Firefox maintainers in Fedora don't want
> the KDE patches without it getting upstream. Firefox is one of the
> frequently updated software and non-upstream patches create a burden. Why
> aren't the patches upstream? You are fighting in the wrong place. The
> maintainers decision in this matter is final. Please accept the
> difference of opinion and move on. Repeating your opinions over and over
> again changes nothing.
But applying KDE integration patches should be a KDE SIG matter, the
individual package maintainers should have to comply with KDE SIG decisions
on the matter.
How can we offer an integrated desktop experience when individual
maintainers refuse to work with us, and FESCo only makes our work harder
with useless bureaucratic policies instead of helping us achieve our goals
in a way coordinated throughout the distribution?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
