On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
. Their position is not consistent: if we ask for non-
------
You seem to refuse to accept that Firefox maintainers in Fedora don't want the KDE patches without it getting upstream. Firefox is one of the frequently updated software and non-upstream patches create a burden. Why aren't the patches upstream? You are fighting in the wrong place. The maintainers decision in this matter is final. Please accept the difference of opinion and move on. Repeating your opinions over and over again changes nothing.
Rahul
. Their position is not consistent: if we ask for non-
upstream changes, they say the trademarks forbid them so they can't do
anything, if we ask for getting the trademarks removed, they say that it
wouldn't change anything anyway. Either they're just using the trademarks as
an excuse for their laziness, or the trademarks are the problem and need to
be removed, it's one or the other.
------
You seem to refuse to accept that Firefox maintainers in Fedora don't want the KDE patches without it getting upstream. Firefox is one of the frequently updated software and non-upstream patches create a burden. Why aren't the patches upstream? You are fighting in the wrong place. The maintainers decision in this matter is final. Please accept the difference of opinion and move on. Repeating your opinions over and over again changes nothing.
Rahul
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
