On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:17 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Friday, August 13, 2010 05:09:17 pm Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > Then we have to push broken updates, policy says so and it's ok, so let's > > > do it > > > > > > :( > > > > A policy requiring us to push something broken is broken. I'm not going to > > push broken shit. > > Just irony but it feels like... > I wonder why I get the impression that the only ones who strongly oppose this change are you folks from KDE SIG... Are you doing things differently from anyone else in fedora - the rest of us are either more or less neutral or positive towards this new change? Basically from both user and maintainer point of view I'm for more testing and more conservative update policy in general in stable branches. Cheers, Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
