On 08/13/2010 12:23 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > On Friday, August 13, 2010, 1:05:16 PM, Kevin wrote: >> Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> My understanding of the SIG concept was that they were groups of people >>> who were self-organizing around a particular theme to further that theme >>> in Fedora, i.e. Games, Live Upgrade, KDE, etc. >> Right, but that makes them naturally the best bodies to make decisions >> related to those respective themes. >> Kevin Kofler > It seems to me that "best" depends on the point of view of the person > in question, and the outcome of a given decision. > > The FireFox maintainer might well be viewed as best qualified to > determine which (if any) distribution-specific patches they want to > support over the life of the package. If you say no, then put that > maintainer in a "FireFox SIG" and repeat the question. > > FESCo might well be viewed as best to deal with policies related to > updates across _all_ Fedora SIGs and releases, since that one of the > tasks they were _ELECTED_ to perform. > > Seems you think best is one way in one case, and the other way in the > other case. It is this inconsistency that folks are trying to bring > to your attention. > > Al > Hey, no fair stating the same point as I did, at the same time, but better, and without ranting. That's cheating! :) -J -- - in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
