Karanbir Singh wrote: > One of the MailScanner with postfix setups that I run handles in the > region of 3 to 3.2 Million emails a day. I havent lost a single email in > queue transition. Are there any advantages of using MailScanner instead of Amavisd-new? Just curious.
[Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: avtargill at gmail.com (Avtar Gill)
- Date: Fri Mar 25 16:31:52 2005
- In-reply-to: <42441229.8020702@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <42435DDC.4090602@xxxxxxxx> <1111715374.28940.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42439F7D.1060805@xxxxxxxxx> <1111732870.29621.46.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4243D567.9090801@xxxxxxxxx> <1111747377.11539.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4243F9CA.6030703@xxxxxxxxx> <1111755914.11539.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42441229.8020702@xxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: John Hinton
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Les Mikesell
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Barads
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Les Mikesell
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Barads
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Alexander Dalloz
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Barads
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Alexander Dalloz
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- From: Karanbir Singh
- [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- Prev by Date: [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- Next by Date: [Centos] Yum problem CentOS 3.3?
- Previous by thread: [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- Next by thread: [Centos] Sendmail vs. Postfix
- Index(es):
 |