Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham schrieb:
> Michael Schwendt (bugs.michael@xxxxxxx) said: 
>>> What's the failure point here now?
>> Packages marked as "dead.package" lack the "Makefile", which breaks
>> cvs-import.sh. There is a patch by me (posted to fesco in June last year)
>> which I've resent a few days ago, because it has not been applied so far.
> Hm. Why does dead.package not have a makefile? To prevent accidental
> builds?

I don't think there was a strong reasons why we wanted it do be deleted
(at least I can't remember one). I was more a "delete everything and put
a file dead.package into the directory" iirc.

CU
thl

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux