Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/30/07, Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
> Further filing of review bugs is blocking on two issues:
>
> 1) We must decide whether or not the review should be assigned to the
> reviewer or package owner.  I believe package owner is more logical,
> because that person is accountable to doing the work.  The reviewer is
> already tracked by name in the flag itself, which too is logical.

OK, it seems the only real drawback to "ASSIGNED to owner instead of
reviewer" is Tibbs' good point about being able to see it on frontpage.cgi.

Guys, I have to say this constant switching back and forth of ASIGNEE
is not a good idea.  Not only is it a pain in the keister to keep on
switching the ASIGNEE back and forth like a tennis ball, but if the
packager forgets to do this, then the reviewer will never get e-mails
on the bug.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux