On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Christopher Stone wrote:
>
> 1) php-pear has a major upgrade (1.5.0) and the current version is
> 1.4.11 in cvs. The 1.5.0 upgrade is going to bring on significant
> changes. I am asking him to make these significant changes _before_ I
> do a formal review. However, he insists that I must do my review on
> the version that is currently in CVS.
You need to review what he intends to put in F7. If that's not 1.5.0, then
oh well. Asking someone to do a major upgrade just for you to review it
is silly. Especially given that we're driving towards a test2 release!
> 2) Joe refuses to make benign trivial changes to the spec file. These
> are changes that were suggested by members of the packaging committee,
> for example f13 suggested to use %{SOURCEx} notation when installing
> sources instead of $RPM_SOURCE_DIR. Joe refuses to make simple
> changes like this and would rather bring the issues back up with the
> packaging committee. I think he feels wasting the committe's time is
> more important than ten seconds of his time to make the change.
If they are only _suggested_ changes, and not _required_ changes, then he
doesn't have to change. Period. As a review, you can suggest so but when
someone says no, then drop it.
josh
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
