Re: Problems with core review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
I have been trying to help with the core review, and I wish to share the
major burdens I encountered:

1) Online CVS access is not available to reviewers. There is a delay of
about two hours, I believe. Packager says "I fixed it", reviewer says
"did you not forget to commit, because I don't see it"?

I agree this is a problem, but not one that we can solve easily. This problem is already scheduled to go away in the near future when the CVS move happens. Can we just deal for now and focus on the tougher problems?


2) Core package owners may not be very familiar with the packaging
guidelines, or why they are actually there. Some may even think it's
just some level of bureaucracy/extra burden (in short, not very
exciting).

They need to just deal with it. If they haven't heard about the packaging guidelines by now, they are not doing their job properly and they need some education.

/me prepares the cluebat.


3) Core package owners were not asked to clean up their packages before
putting them up for review. Packages have been sitting there and then
suddenly a horde of odd and demanding people have jumped on to review
them. This also means that the quality of what being reviewed is quite
random, when a quick look at the guidelines (and doing some related
action) may have minimized the extra communication and the possibility
of reviewers burning out because of repeating the same basic things
instead of finding/fixing the more interesting issues.

4) The process is not very clear. Packagers have fixed some of the
mentioned issues and change the status to MODIFIED, packagers have fixed
some of the mentioned issues and change the status to FIXED/RAWHIDE, ...
But I assume that's getting fixed.

This needs to be addressed in the next version of the process. I think the states like MODIFIED, CLOSED RAWHIDE, should become irrelevant. What matters is the fedora-review+ flag, and if it happened properly or not.

Warren

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux