On 2/3/07, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I kind of like the moving of assigned. It shows who next needs to take action. Of course something like NEEDINFO (emailaddress) might work as well.
I don't. It's an extra step that most people will forget to do. I'm just not going to bother, I'm going to assign it to me (the reviewer) and be done with it. Plus, was there *ever* any confusion before this change as to who next needs to take action?? I simply do not see any extra benefit from all this extra work. We are supposed to be making things *easier*, not more difficult. Another case is all these extras steps, now not only do we have to rely on someone to make cvs branches, we also have to rely on someone to add entries to owners.list, next it will be comps, then we will have to get permissions just to edit our own packages! I do *not* like the direction things have been moving recently. I sincerely hope that these problems will be worked out and things will eventually get simpler and more streamlined. I want to see less red tape, not more. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly