On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 01:20:16 +0100 Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx (Christian Iseli) wrote: > On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 08:26:47 -0800, Christopher Stone wrote: > > Guys, I have to say this constant switching back and forth of > > ASIGNEE is not a good idea. Not only is it a pain in the keister > > to keep on switching the ASIGNEE back and forth like a tennis ball, > > but if the packager forgets to do this, then the reviewer will > > never get e-mails on the bug. > > prolly a good idea to have both in the CC field... At least for the core merge review requests, the redhat "owner" of the package is already in the CC, so they at least will get all emails from it even if they aren't assigned. I kind of like the moving of assigned. It shows who next needs to take action. Of course something like NEEDINFO (emailaddress) might work as well. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
