On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 08:29 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > IMO, there is no reason to put GNOME in a privileged position. > Those parts of it which are requirement of a "minimal install" are > inevitable but anything else is waste of disc space. The same applies to > GCC, python, Perl, ... simply any package. GNOME is "first among equals" to be sure - it's what we have the most expertise with, it's what we support and the GNOME project has a design goal that's consistent with Red Hat's own. There's a natural alignment. So if the Red Hat folks decide that we want to do a single CD install, it will probably use GNOME as the desktop and its apps as the defaults. That's not to say that we wouldn't enable others to create something KDE-based or xfce based. Quite the opposite, we would encourage it. We just wouldn't spend a huge amount of time on it ourselves. --Chris