On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 08:33 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:39:47PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > libxml-devel-1.8.17-13 > > Why on earth do I still hear about libxml (v1) in the context of Fedora ? > Repeat after me, this package is dead, unmaintained, and nothing should > rely on it anymore, shipping a -devel for it is just insane, I though the > decision it was dropped for good had been taken ages ago, or did I missed > something ? At least the following still shipped rawhide packages have a build dependency on libxml-devel: gal, GConf, gnome-print, gnucash, gtkhtml, Guppi, libglade, oaf.
