Re: libxml v1 dependencies (was: Re: multilib fun - devel packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/15/05, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there a reason why there has to be a financial software in core?  I
> see pushing this to extras as a win win situation.  Core wins by being
> smaller, and the deps just for gnucash can go as well, plus the
> community that uses this software can maintain it, and track the port in
> extras.

whats the target group for Core again? knowledge worker doesn't
encompass finance tracking of any sort? I think thats probably a very
very narrow definition of "knowledge" "worker" and the resulting
combination of the two words.  And if you want to apply that narrow a
definition.. i have a very very long list of application level
functionality I could suggest be shown the door as well to suppliment
Seth's list of duplicate functionality.

-jef"I'll let you remove finance software from the target if we also
remove graphics software too.. I'm all for compromise"spaleta


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux