Hi
I'd prefer if a "1CD-Fedora" was to contain only those packages a user
needs to be able to bring up his system to the point, where he can
configure it and download additional packages from the net.
I.e. I'd prefer a 1CD-Fedora not to be much more than an extended
"installer/bootstrap CD".
This does not work for many regions in the world where net access is
limited or extremely costly. Such as a CD is also not useful target in
itself for redistribution. You cant get into do anything useful for
anybody without downloading stuff from the net first. For that there is
already a boot.iso image which provides a network installation option.
I feel you seem to be mixing up "1CD-distro" with "FC vs. FE" and
"RH-maintained vs. community-maintained", here. In my understanding
there actually is no real connection between these topics at all.
I meant for example that one of the targets such as Fedora GNOME could
by build by the Fedora Core team while leaving rest of the other
potential variations like Fedora KDE or Fedora XFCE build by the rest of
the community using infrastructure or tools provided within the Fedora
Project.
regards
Rahul
