Re: Re: Progress? What's that.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Luter wrote:
> 
> I have two of those cards -- they are very good, you will like them :)
> . But I have very little space in my case right now, so I can only
> handle one card (well, I could live with an agp and a pci video, but
> definately not two pci's).
> 
> When I first mentioned my problems to the list, they said the Radeon
> 7500's "have been flaky", or something like that.  So are they?  And
> are there any brands that really work well under Linux?  (That is, the
> dvi, dual head, 2D/3D accell., etc. just all work?)
> 
> Eck.  My repeat rate on my keyboard is -way- slow.
> 
> I'll check out that list (but it's not very detailed, if memory
> serves).

I can't recommend any cards in terms of speed or stability,
but one way to find out is to google eg: xfree86 radeon
or: xf86config radeon.
 
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:44:20AM +1000, Russell wrote:
> > XFree86 4.x seems to have less video cards currently supported
> > than 3.x, so i'd check this list for compatible cards:
> >   http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/RELNOTES4.html#13
> >
> > I just got a $10 matrox mystique card on the weekend at a pc
> > swapmeet to add an extra head to X. It's only got 2MB ram, but
> > that's ok;)
_______________________________________________

Newbie@XFree86.Org
*** To unsubscribe , or change message options, see:
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/newbie

[Index of Archives]     [XFree86]     [Xfree86 Xpert]     [X.org]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Picture Sharing]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux