On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 07:44:21AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > I've built a new release which contains numerous fixes > incorporated since the Red Hat Linux 9 release, Hm, I tried that on an Acer Travelmate 230 laptop with Intel 845G video. It has an LCD screen with a native resolution of 1024x768. The trouble is that I can get a screen of that size only in an 8 bit depth. In a 16 bit depth it gives me that: (II) I810(0): Not using mode "1024x768" (no mode of this name) (II) I810(0): Not using mode "800x600" (no mode of this name) (II) I810(0): Increasing the scanline pitch to allow tiling mode (640 -> 1024). (--) I810(0): Virtual size is 640x480 (pitch 1024) (**) I810(0): *Built-in mode "640x480" and I end up with a picture which is barely usable. In 24 bit I get (total bummer): (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screens found This is the same with included in RH9 XFree86-4.3.0-2 and new XFree86-4.3.0-5. There is one visible difference though. Although logs for both cases look similar I have some picture with 4.3.0-2 and a completely blank screen with 4.3.0-5. Not very exciting. > If there are any new bugs found, please also report them in > bugzilla: I will make up some bugzilla reports with log files later. Michal _______________________________________________ xfree86-list mailing list xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com