Re: looking for comments/reactions to the fedora project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Well, my thoughts so far:
>
> - Debian based distributions, while fun to tinker with, are not a good
> server solution (IMO).  The apt-get package manager, while enjoyable,
> also is apt (excuse the pun) to get out of hand at times.  And
> Debian/Libranet's strength (tons of software) is also its weakness in
> the server room... too much choice.  It's nice having a distro that's
> been "professionally" pared down for non-hobbyist/non-desktop usage.
>
> - FreeBSD.  I'm a big proponent of all things *BSD, but this also falls
> short in terms of patch management.  While it's not a big deal for your
> average SysAdmin to patch from source, it's not an enviable task to
> automate.  And "build world" is not something your average server farm
> is going to place faith in.
>
> - RHPW.  Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of this to play with.  While
> I appreciate Ed Wilt's rpm package listing, I note that some of it
> includes post-install stuff (mysql, for example), so it's hard for me to
> get a real glimpse of what RH is offering with this product.  I still
> think RH is head-and-shoulders above the competitors for non-hobbyist
> offerings, it's just going to take some time to get used to their
> changes.
>
> At this time, RHPW or RHWS is still in the lead for server
> installations.  The only thing holding me back from making a formal
> recommendation to my existing "community"-based clients is RH's
> indecisions regarding the future of RHPW.
>
> *** Please note, the opinions given above are just that... my opinions.
> I'm not an expert with Debian, so please withhold flames.
>
> -- 
> Jason Dixon, RHCE
> DixonGroup Consulting
> http://www.dixongroup.net
>
>
> -- 

What about  Suse and Mandrake, i know that Suse is got a good server
plataform and manndrake is very good in desktops, but is also good for
server plataform, how ever i'm concerned also mostly for the up2date that as
i understand is not aviable with fedora, or else what sould we do with our
production server once the up2date is gone.

        David Vazquez Guzman
        E-Mail:   dvazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        INSTITUTO BRILLAMONT
        San Pedro Garza Garcia, N.L.
        Tel y Fax: +52 (81)  8338 7464  y  8338 7465  Ext. 123
        Visite nuestro Home Page:
        http://www.brillamont.edu.mx



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux