Re: looking for comments/reactions to the fedora project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 17:33, David Vazquez Guzman wrote:

> What about  Suse and Mandrake, i know that Suse is got a good server
> plataform and manndrake is very good in desktops, but is also good for
> server plataform, how ever i'm concerned also mostly for the up2date that as
> i understand is not aviable with fedora, or else what sould we do with our
> production server once the up2date is gone.

SuSE makes a decent distribution, but it's not for me.  It's definitely
not something that I'm looking for on servers, although the acquisition
by Novell may change that.  I've *never* liked Mandrake;  it just
doesn't lend itself to the kind of CLI "tweakability" that Red Hat
does.  Not to mention that's it's a desktop-focused distribution, and it
shows.

-- 
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux