Re: it's so disappointing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:21:42 -0800
Jack Bowling <jbinpg@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 07:31:11AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> 
> [snip] 
> > Oh, I certainly second the bad communications part--planning, too.
> > And the comment about Linux workstations (not) was such a blunder that
> > I have to believe he had a brain cloud that day.  But I will grant that
> > they have abandoned one niche market--not free, but the very-low-cost
> > for-pay reliable distribution.[snip]
> 
> The RH head honcho is no dummy and knew perfectly well how his comments
> would be interpreted. I see this as a move to lay waste to the desktop
> market of *other* linux vendors since RH as a supporting entity has 
> abandoned that market segment. All in all, not a very classy move.
> 
>
It was long ago pointed out that it is both unnecessary and unwise to attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by thoughlessness, incompetance, or other forms of foolish error.

rickf


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux