|
Just want to second Randy. I've been always in awe about how artists could come up with such masterpieces before the discovery of electricity and the invention of photography. Vermeer tinkered with the camera obscura in the 15th century in his "studio", but that just helped with the outlines and not the subtleties of the light. And how about those ever changing light conditions when trying to finish a painting outdoors? ...
If we can provide more creative and intuitive access to younger and coming generations - it's all good. And some of these animations are just plain cool. Klaus Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:42 -0500 From: randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: amazing animation of classical art To: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This was neat. It's not that the originals aren't enough. It's someone's internal representation of what they see playing out in them. This is a common class discussion and teaching technique. "Make the viewer feel the motion." It might be away to introduce the younger pre teen or tween generations to art they still in their youth find boooorrriiinnggggg. On Jan 18, 2014 1:07 AM, "Trevor Cunningham" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Why? Were the originals not enough? |
