Re: golden age layoffs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, the D800e gives a 36 megapixel image, which at 8 bytes per pixel in raw yield a little over 250 megabyte file right  out of the camera.

So take 4 frames with the camera set to vertical and paste them together and you get a 144 megapixel image whose time to take all exposures can be less than one second.  The image will have a 3X8 aspect ratio and require about one gigabyte to store, about 4 times the size from the scanner.

If that's not wide enough for panoramic need, add 1, 2, or three more frames wide.

The rig to do this is pretty simple.  The camera rotates about the nodal point of the lens and the frames fit nicely together.

Even a D3x can do almost as well.
Canon, Pentax, etc. can do it as well.

James


Luke 23:24

On Jun 13, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Digital is a long way from catching up to medium format 100 speed Velveeta or Ektachrome. Wit h film I get practicality, I don’t have to plug into a Sony Vaio to shoot and I never get a corrupted file or a digital wallet which loses all its files. I have a bank vault with negatives in it and I have a Creo which has scanned thousands of images. What’s not to like? I have a workflow which works for me and the prints I am currently making are 54x182”. Can your Nikon D anything do that?


Art Faul


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux