Digital Millenium Copyright Act take-down notice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



http://www.theregister.com/2006/11/04/eff_fights_bogus_dmca_case/


"We had in good faith published a photograph supplied to us by the subject
of an otherwise uncontroversial article. A few days later, one very annoyed
photographer emailed us claiming copyright for the picture and demanded its
removal, or a fee.

But we were not quick enough for him. In the meantime, he fired off a DMCA
takedown notice to our webhost in the US. The company in turn fired off a
letter telling us to remove the allegedly infringing content and set us a
deadline of *a few hours* to confirm in writing that we had done so.

Otherwise it would "suspend network access to the server hosting the
website". ...A suspension would have affected all our servers - including
those hosted in the UK, as well as the US.

So our entire site would have been closed for business, all because of one
photograph - admittedly not ours to republish. This did not strike us an
entirely proportionate response, and it brought home to us how easy it is
to use the DMCA to ambush websites housed in the US or hosted overseas .."

k


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux