Re: "PAM Central", was Re: Order of executing modules, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tony den Haan wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Sébastien Tricaud wrote:



Le mer 19/03/2003 à 16:51, Steve Langasek a écrit :


On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Sébastien Tricaud wrote:



but, the problem is that the politic of sourceforge is bad (just read
their licence).
And, even if I'm look for such a place, I'll never release my modules on
the sourceforge webpage because of their polotic (the licence of your
program can be owned by sourceforge regardless the licence, you agree
for that when clicking on "I agree".


What "I agree" button is this? I've never clicked on a button that
required anything of the sort; can you provide a link to the questionable
text?


I'm talking about this text :
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6048&group_id=1

that's why savannah started, and this is a better idea to user
savannah.nongnu.org and you will see that most free softwares which were
on sourceforge before have moved.



Well, there's the sourceforge site already, but it gives the impression Andrew isn't really looking after it at the moment. I agree a central repository, actively maintained, is a must. Andrew, are you still around? Need a hand getting sourceforge going? or indeed move to savannah?

tony

I have a few cycles to spare to get this going; I think I can use the time I would have spent figuring out pam stuff to get the repository going, and then I can better leverage what others have already figured out...however:

If any developers are NOT going to submit their code to SourceForge because of the SF submission policy, then that would prevent ALL the code being there. And since having all the code in one place is one of my (admittedly selfish) objectives in starting this thread, I think that eliminates SF. If there is a place where everybody is happy putting their code (maybe savannah?), then that seems like the logical place.

Let me say it another way: does using savannah make anybody "gag"? (My version of the gag rule: unless a proposed group decision makes a participant "gag" ("gag" meaning "vomit"), then the decision is acceptable to the group :)

Does savannah make anyone gag?
(we already know SourceForge does)

--johnT




_______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list









_______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux