On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:09:39 +0200, Karsten de Freese wrote: > hi Jean, > > > Am 26.10.2010 21:06, schrieb Jean Delvare: > > I think you forgot to check the FAQ and in particular: > > http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/FAQ/Chapter3#Isetnewlimitsanditdidntwork > > > > > indeed - I remember having read that before, but just forgot .. > > now setting the limits does work for jc42 _min and _max values, however > not for _max_hyst (although the setting seems to exist) > > The latest config file: > > /bus "i2c-0" "SMBus PIIX4 adapter at 0b00" > > chip "jc42-i2c-0-18" > label temp1 "DRAM_0" > set temp1_max 60 > set temp1_crit 70 > set temp1_max_hyst 65 > > chip "jc42-i2c-0-19" > label temp1 "DRAM_1" > set temp1_max 60 > set temp1_crit 70 > set temp1_max_hyst 65 > / > and the latest output > /karsten:~/temp$ sudo sensors -s > Error: File /etc/sensors.d/jc42.conf, line 7: Failed to set value > jc42-i2c-0-18: At least one "set" statement failed > Error: File /etc/sensors.d/jc42.conf, line 14: Failed to set value > jc42-i2c-0-19: At least one "set" statement failed/ There's a trick: temp1_max_hyst exists but is read-only. temp1_crit_hyst is writable, set it and the same delta will be applied to temp1_max_hyst (relative to temp1_max, obviously.) The reason is that there's only one register in the chip to store the delta, and it applied to both limits. > (actually I get the same error message for the K10temp _min & _max > settings, but maybe these are hardwired?) Yes they are hardwired for k10temp. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/wishlist.html _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors