Re: the push to get rid of CONFIG_VT in the kernel and the future of Speakup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Completely agree about evolving a community consensus on the
contingency. I guess we're doing that now in these discussions. When
last did we have so many emails on the Speakup list? Sheesh! <grin>

Here's my concern ...

We need to catch the requirements phase of the replacement console
environment. I'm fine about third party development of the screen
reader. I want users involved in that. But, you can only take advantage
of what the environment allows. We need to make sure our needs are
supported.

Had we had this kind of input into pulse audio, I think it would have
been a different app from the gitgo. We didn't, and we've suffered the
consequence ever since.

Janina

Chris Brannon writes:
> Janina Sajka <janina@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > If the answer is that the console needs to stay, then we need console
> > based a11y.
> 
> Yes, console access is still useful and relevant for lots of us.
> 
> The whole point of the message that started this thread
> is that  We need to be aware of possible future developments in Linux,
> so that our community can adapt without being caught off-guard.
> I'd really like to know how long we will have the current console code
> in the kernel.  For now, the answer is "indefinitely", but there's a
> real possibility that the situation could change in coming years.
> 
> I guess the next step is to start making a contingency plan.
> How will a screen reader be integrated with the coming userspace console
> solution?  Should it be included directly in that codebase, or should it
> be some sort of third-party add-on?
> I think the latter approach is probably the best, because it can be
> maintained by the people who care the most about console a11y.  Also, it
> allows for multiple interchangeable implementations, independent of the
> userspace console server itself.  That means we will need some method of
> hooking into the console server for accessibility purposes, in much the
> same way as we use the kernel-provided keyboard and VT notifier
> mechanism today.  For that, we'll have to come up with some sort of API,
> and we can't do that in a vacuum.  At some point, we're going to have to
> open a dialog with the folks who are working on the userspace console
> server, so that our concerns can be addressed.
> 
> -- Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
			sip:janina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
		Email:	janina@xxxxxxxxxxx

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair,	Protocols & Formats	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
	Indie UI			http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/

_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux