Re: the push to get rid of CONFIG_VT in the kernel and the future of Speakup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What I have done in those cases is to hook up another computer with a
null modem cable and use the terminal program in that computer to read
the output where I wuld say console=0 on the command line to redirect
the output.  However, speakup built in catches a lot.

Chris Brannon <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "John G. Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Here at the University of Wisconsin, there
> > are a lot of linux systems admin jobs. And for the majority of them,
> > it would be a big problem if you couldn't access the boot messages.
> 
> Is the serial console support not appropriate / acceptable?
> When I first started out with Linux, I had a Braille 'n Speak, and I
> used it as a dumb terminal.  If I started the serial console at boot, I
> got to see all of the boot messages from the kernel, regardless of
> whether I had Speakup.  It's not really a good way to work, when
> compared to Speakup, but for tasks such as diagnosing boot failures, it
> was usable.
> If I worked professionally as an on-site sysadmin, I might try to
> do something similar today.  The BNS isn't manufactured any more, but
> I'm sure there's something that would work as well.
> 
> -- Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux