Linux S390: System z9 mainframe

• Thread Index

• Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mm/debug_vm_pgtable] a97a171093: BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for_address
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] S390: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones
  • From: "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5] ima: move APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM dependency on ARCH_POLICY to runtime
  • From: Bruno Meneguele <bmeneg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 00/34] iommu: Move iommu_group setup to IOMMU core code
  • From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 3/9] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 1/9] s390x: saving regs for interrupts
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 4/9] s390x: clock and delays calculations
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 6/9] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 7/9] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 5/9] s390x: define function to wait for interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 0/9] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v11 2/9] s390x: I/O interrupt registration
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH net 0/5] net/smc: fixes 2020-07-08
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH][next] s390/dasd: Use struct_size() helper
  • From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 4/5] net/smc: switch smcd_dev_list spinlock to mutex
  • From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 5/5] net/smc: tolerate future SMCD versions
  • From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 3/5] net/smc: fix sleep bug in smc_pnet_find_roce_resource()
  • From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 2/5] net/smc: fix work request handling
  • From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 1/5] net/smc: separate LLC wait queues for flow and messages
  • From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 0/5] net/smc: fixes 2020-07-08
  • From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 18/25] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] s390/zcrypt: driver callback to indicate resource in use
  • From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/7] zfcp: cleanups and small changes for 5.9
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] s390/zcrypt: driver callback to indicate resource in use
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] s390: implement and optimize vmemmap_free()
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH][next] s390/dasd: Use struct_size() helper
  • From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] s390: implement and optimize vmemmap_free()
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/7] zfcp: cleanups and small changes for 5.9
  • From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 18/25] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 18/25] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] s390: implement and optimize vmemmap_free()
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] s390: implement and optimize vmemmap_free()
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH RESEND] lockdep: Move list.h inclusion into lockdep.h
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.8-rc5
  • From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
• [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.8-rc5
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bpf: bpf_probe_read helper restriction on s390x
  • From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bpf: bpf_probe_read helper restriction on s390x
  • From: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] s390/vmemmap: cleanup when vmemmap_populate() fails
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V4 4/4] Documentation/mm: Add descriptions for arch page table helpers
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V4 3/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add debug prints for individual tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V4 2/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating advanced arch page table helpers
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V4 1/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating arch helpers for core MM features
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V4 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• bpf: bpf_probe_read helper restriction on s390x
  • From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] drivers/s390/char/tty3270: Remove function callback casts
  • From: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] s390/vmemmap: cleanup when vmemmap_populate() fails
  • From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 00/34] iommu: Move iommu_group setup to IOMMU core code
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] s390/vmemmap: cleanup when vmemmap_populate() fails
  • From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PULL 0/1] vfio-ccw fix
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] s390: implement and optimize vmemmap_free()
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 6/9] s390/vmem: cleanup empty page tables
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 7/9] s390/vmemmap: fallback to PTEs if mapping large PMD fails
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 9/9] s390/vmemmap: avoid memset(PAGE_UNUSED) when adding consecutive sections
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 8/9] s390/vmemmap: remember unused sub-pmd ranges
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 5/9] s390/vmemmap: take the vmem_mutex when populating/freeing
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 2/9] s390/vmem: recursive implementation of vmem_remove_range()
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 0/9] s390: implement and optimize vmemmap_free()
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 1/9] s390/vmem: rename vmem_add_mem() to vmem_add_range()
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 4/9] s390/vmemmap: cleanup when vmemmap_populate() fails
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 3/9] s390/vmemmap: implement vmemmap_free()
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/7] zfcp: use prandom_u32_max() for backoff
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 4/7] scsi: docs: remove invalid link and update text for zfcp kernel config
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 7/7] zfcp: avoid benign overflow of the Request Queue's free-level
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/7] scsi: docs: update outdated link to IBM developerworks
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 5/7] zfcp: clean up zfcp_erp_action_ready()
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 6/7] zfcp: replace open-coded list move
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/7] zfcp: cleanups and small changes for 5.9
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/7] zfcp: fix an outdated comment for zfcp_qdio_send()
  • From: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PULL 1/1] vfio-ccw: Fix a build error due to missing include of linux/slab.h
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PULL 0/1] vfio-ccw fix
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] vfio-ccw: Fix a build error due to missing include of linux/slab.h
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] vfio-ccw: Fix a build error due to missing include of linux/slab.h
  • From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm: cleanup usage of <asm/pgalloc.h>
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 17/20] block: rename generic_make_request to submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 4/9] s390x: clock and delays calculations
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 6/9] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 5/9] s390x: define function to wait for interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 3/9] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 8/9] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 9/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 7/9] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 0/9] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 2/9] s390x: I/O interrupt registration
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v10 1/9] s390x: saving regs for interrupts
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 18/20] block: refator submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 18/20] block: refator submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 18/20] block: refator submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 17/20] block: rename generic_make_request to submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 16/20] block: move ->make_request_fn to struct block_device_operations
  • From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 09/20] bcache: stop setting ->queuedata
  • From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 18/20] block: refator submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/12] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 12/20] block: remove the request_queue argument from blk_queue_split
  • From: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 36/53] s390/debug: avoid kernel warning on too large number of pages
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 28/40] s390/kasan: fix early pgm check handler execution
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 29/40] s390/debug: avoid kernel warning on too large number of pages
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 16/27] s390/kasan: fix early pgm check handler execution
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 10/17] s390/kasan: fix early pgm check handler execution
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 08/13] s390/kasan: fix early pgm check handler execution
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 17/27] s390/debug: avoid kernel warning on too large number of pages
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 35/53] s390/kasan: fix early pgm check handler execution
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 10/20] dm: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 16/20] block: move ->make_request_fn to struct block_device_operations
  • From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 18/26] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 0/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: rename ->make_request_fn and move it to the block_device_operations v2
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 00/34] iommu: Move iommu_group setup to IOMMU core code
  • From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1] s390/extmem: remove stale -ENOSPC comment and handling
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFD] uevent handling for subchannels
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• rename ->make_request_fn and move it to the block_device_operations v2
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 01/20] nfblock: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 04/20] null_blk: stop using ->queuedata for bio mode
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 05/20] ps3vram: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 06/20] rsxx: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 08/20] zram: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 10/20] dm: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 11/20] fs: remove a weird comment in submit_bh_wbc
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 09/20] bcache: stop setting ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 07/20] umem: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 02/20] simdisk: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 16/20] block: move ->make_request_fn to struct block_device_operations
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 18/20] block: refator submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 19/20] block: shortcut __submit_bio_noacct for blk-mq drivers
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 20/20] block: remove direct_make_request
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 15/20] block: remove the nr_sectors variable in generic_make_request_checks
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 13/20] block: tidy up a warning in bio_check_ro
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 17/20] block: rename generic_make_request to submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 14/20] block: remove the NULL queue check in generic_make_request_checks
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 12/20] block: remove the request_queue argument from blk_queue_split
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 03/20] drbd: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 00/34] iommu: Move iommu_group setup to IOMMU core code
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 18/26] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR
  • From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: rename ->make_request_fn and move it to the block_device_operations
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: rename ->make_request_fn and move it to the block_device_operations
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: rename ->make_request_fn and move it to the block_device_operations
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: rename ->make_request_fn and move it to the block_device_operations
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 11/20] fs: remove a weird comment in submit_bh_wbc
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: silence a KASAN false positive
  • From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1] s390/extmem: remove stale -ENOSPC comment and handling
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 0/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 2/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 01/20] nfblock: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating advanced arch page table helpers
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 04/20] null_blk: stop using ->queuedata for bio mode
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 05/20] ps3vram: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 08/20] zram: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 07/20] umem: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 09/20] bcache: stop setting ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 10/20] dm: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 11/20] fs: remove a weird comment in submit_bh_wbc
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 06/20] rsxx: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 03/20] drbd: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 01/20] nfblock: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 12/20] block: remove the request_queue argument from blk_queue_split
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 14/20] block: remove the NULL queue check in generic_make_request_checks
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 13/20] block: tidy up a warning in bio_check_ro
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 15/20] block: remove the nr_sectors variable in generic_make_request_checks
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 17/20] block: rename generic_make_request to submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 16/20] block: move ->make_request_fn to struct block_device_operations
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 18/20] block: refator submit_bio_noacct
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 20/20] block: remove direct_make_request
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 19/20] block: shortcut __submit_bio_noacct for blk-mq drivers
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 02/20] simdisk: stop using ->queuedata
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• rename ->make_request_fn and move it to the block_device_operations
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating advanced arch page table helpers
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6/8] asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic pgd_free()
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm: remove unneeded includes of <asm/pgalloc.h>
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFD] uevent handling for subchannels
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] drivers/s390/char/tty3270: Remove function callback casts
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm: cleanup usage of <asm/pgalloc.h>
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic pmd_alloc_one() and pmd_free_one()
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  • From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic pmd_alloc_one() and pmd_free_one()
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 9/8] mm: Account PMD tables like PTE tables
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/8] opeinrisc: switch to generic version of pte allocation
  • From: Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic pmd_alloc_one() and pmd_free_one()
  • From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 9/8] mm: Account PMD tables like PTE tables
  • From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm: cleanup usage of <asm/pgalloc.h>
  • From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] drivers/s390/char/tty3270: Remove function callback casts
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 8/8] mm: move p?d_alloc_track to separate header file
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 7/8] mm: move lib/ioremap.c to mm/
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 6/8] asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic pgd_free()
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 5/8] asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic pud_alloc_one() and pud_free_one()
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic pmd_alloc_one() and pmd_free_one()
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/8] mm: remove unneeded includes of <asm/pgalloc.h>
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/8] opeinrisc: switch to generic version of pte allocation
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/8] xtensa: switch to generic version of pte allocation
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/8] mm: cleanup usage of <asm/pgalloc.h>
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] drivers/s390/char/tty3270: Remove function callback casts
  • From: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/5] exec: cleanup the execve wrappers
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 4/5] exec: split prepare_arg_pages
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 5/5] exec: add a kernel_execveat helper
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/5] exec: cleanup the count() function
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/5] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• properly support exec with kernel pointers v3
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating advanced arch page table helpers
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating advanced arch page table helpers
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 18/26] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] s390: Add API Docs for DIAGNOSE 0x318 and fix rst
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.8-rc3
  • From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: kvm: add documentation for KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: kvm: add documentation for KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 0/2] s390: Add API Docs for DIAGNOSE 0x318 and fix rst
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: kvm: add documentation for KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH][next] s390: appldata: Use struct_size() helper
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.8-rc3
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] arm: Break cyclic percpu include
  • From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: kvm: add documentation for KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: kvm: add documentation for KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: kvm: add documentation for KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 18/26] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] docs: kvm: fix rst formatting
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] docs: kvm: add documentation for KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/2] s390: Add API Docs for DIAGNOSE 0x318 and fix rst
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 18/26] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] arm: Break cyclic percpu include
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 5.8
  • From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] zfcp: fix panic on ERP timeout for previously dismissed ERP action
  • From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: s390: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] sparc64: Fix asm/percpu.h build error
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 16/28] s390/ptrace: return -ENOSYS when invalid syscall is supplied
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 15/28] s390/seccomp: pass syscall arguments via seccomp_data
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 20/28] s390/vdso: fix vDSO clock_getres()
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 19/28] s390/vdso: Use $(LD) instead of $(CC) to link vDSO
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 14/24] s390/ptrace: pass invalid syscall numbers to tracing
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 15/24] s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 16/24] s390/vdso: Use $(LD) instead of $(CC) to link vDSO
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 10/15] s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 11/15] s390/vdso: fix vDSO clock_getres()
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 4/6] s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 4/6] s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 17/24] s390/vdso: fix vDSO clock_getres()
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 18/28] s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 17/28] s390/ptrace: pass invalid syscall numbers to tracing
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: s390: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Use DIAG318 to set Control Program Name & Version Codes
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] zfcp: fix panic on ERP timeout for previously dismissed ERP action
  • From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: s390: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 3/5] KVM: PPC: clean up redundant kvm_run parameters in assembly
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: arm64: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: MIPS: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: MIPS: clean up redundant kvm_run parameters in assembly
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 0/5] clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 5.8
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [GIT PULL 1/1] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] arm: Break cyclic percpu include
  • From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: silence a KASAN false positive
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 5/8] s390: Break cyclic percpu include
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 7/8] lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 4/8] powerpc64: Break asm/percpu.h vs spinlock_types.h dependency
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 3/8] sparc64: Fix asm/percpu.h build error
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 0/8] lockdep: Change IRQ state tracking to use per-cpu variables
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 6/8] arm: Break cyclic percpu include
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 8/8] lockdep: Remove lockdep_hardirq{s_enabled,_context}() argument
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/entry: Fix NMI vs IRQ state tracking
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 1/8] lockdep: Prepare for NMI IRQ state tracking
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Use DIAG318 to set Control Program Name & Version Codes
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 1/2] s390/setup: diag 318: refactor struct
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 0/2] Use DIAG318 to set Control Program Name & Version Codes
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] s390/setup: diag 318: refactor struct
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AMD IOMMU + SME + amdgpu regression
  • From: "Alex Xu (Hello71)" <alex_y_xu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] s390/setup: diag 318: refactor struct
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AMD IOMMU + SME + amdgpu regression
  • From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  • From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.8-rc2
  • From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.8-rc2
  • From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
  • From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH][next] s390/dasd: Use struct_size() helper
  • From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 18/26] mm/s390: Use general page fault accounting
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks
  • From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] vfio-ccw: Check workqueue before doing START
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [v3 PATCH 2/2] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3/6] exec: cleanup the count() function
  • From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/12] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH net 0/2] s390/qeth: fixes 2020-06-17
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v8 2/2] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 sync and reset
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v8 1/2] s390/setup: diag 318: refactor struct
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v8 0/2] Use DIAG318 to set Control Program Name & Version Codes
  • From: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 5/6] exec: add a kernel_execveat helper
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 4/6] exec: split prepare_arg_pages
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/6] exec: cleanup the count() function
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/6] exec: cleanup the execve wrappers
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers v2
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [v3 PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Split header file into lockdep and lockdep_types
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
  • From: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
  • From: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
  • From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] vfio-ccw: Indicate if a channel_program is started
  • From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
  • From: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 142/388] s390/qdio: tear down thinint indicator after early error
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 143/388] s390/qdio: put thinint indicator after early error
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 141/388] s390/qdio: consistently restore the IRQ handler
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 104/266] s390/qdio: put thinint indicator after early error
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 067/172] s390/qdio: put thinint indicator after early error
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 042/108] s390/qdio: put thinint indicator after early error
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 32/80] s390/qdio: put thinint indicator after early error
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 25/60] s390/qdio: put thinint indicator after early error
  • From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] vfio-ccw: Indicate if a channel_program is started
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH][next] s390: appldata: Use struct_size() helper
  • From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Page fault accounting cleanups
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 0/2] s390/qeth: fixes 2020-06-17
  • From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 1/2] s390/qeth: fix error handling for isolation mode cmds
  • From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net 2/2] s390/qeth: let isolation mode override HW offload restrictions
  • From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [v3 PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Split header file into lockdep and lockdep_types
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  • From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 03/16] s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct and matrix mdev
  • From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 02/16] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices
  • From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/12] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR
  • From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/12] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 04/12] s390x: interrupt registration
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3 0/1] s390: virtio: let arch choose to accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] Documentation/mm: Add descriptions for arch page table helpers
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/12] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/12] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] KVM: s390: reduce number of IO pins to 1
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [v3 PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Split header file into lockdep and lockdep_types
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 04/12] s390x: interrupt registration
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 03/12] s390x: saving regs for interrupts
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Page fault accounting cleanups
  • From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [v3 PATCH 2/2] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [v3 PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Split header file into lockdep and lockdep_types
  • From: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [v3 PATCH 0/2] Splitting ratelimit.h and lockdep.h
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [v3 PATCH 2/2] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_to_pgoff(page) != offset) on s390
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Page fault accounting cleanups
  • From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Page fault accounting cleanups
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] vfio-ccw: Remove the CP_PENDING FSM state
  • From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR
  • From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] vfio-ccw: Check workqueue before doing START
  • From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] vfio-ccw: Indicate if a channel_program is started
  • From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Page fault accounting cleanups
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 03/16] s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct and matrix mdev
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 02/16] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 02/16] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
  • From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  • From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/12] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: fix syscall_get_error for compat processes
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] KVM: MIPS: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
  • From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/12] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_to_pgoff(page) != offset) on s390
  • From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_to_pgoff(page) != offset) on s390
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
  • From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
  • From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
  • From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/6] exec: cleanup the count() function
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 5/6] exec: add a kernel_execveat helper
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 4/6] exec: split prepare_arg_pages
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/6] exec: cleanup the execve wrappers
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 0/1] s390: virtio: let's arch choose to accept devices without IOMMU feature
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] s390/kvm: diagnose 0x318 get/set handling
  • From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 03/12] s390x: saving regs for interrupts
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/12] s390x: Move control register bit definitions and add AFP to them
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 04/12] s390x: interrupt registration
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/12] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/12] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 05/12] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 07/12] s390x: define function to wait for interrupt
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 00/12] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 04/21] mm: free_area_init: use maximal zone PFNs rather than zone sizes
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 04/21] mm: free_area_init: use maximal zone PFNs rather than zone sizes
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 04/21] mm: free_area_init: use maximal zone PFNs rather than zone sizes
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V3 4/4] Documentation/mm: Add descriptions for arch page table helpers
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V3 3/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add debug prints for individual tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V3 2/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating advanced arch page table helpers
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V3 1/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add tests validating arch helpers for core MM features
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests
  • From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [v2 PATCH] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [v2 PATCH] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [v2 PATCH] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [v2 PATCH] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] s390: protvirt: virtio: Refuse device without IOMMU
  • From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [v2 PATCH] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>