Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: introduce dma_get_seg_boundary_nr_pages()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> index 9704f3f76e63..cbc2e62db597 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
> @@ -236,15 +236,10 @@ static unsigned long iommu_range_alloc(struct device *dev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (dev)
> -		boundary_size = ALIGN(dma_get_seg_boundary(dev) + 1,
> -				      1 << tbl->it_page_shift);
> -	else
> -		boundary_size = ALIGN(1UL << 32, 1 << tbl->it_page_shift);
> -	/* 4GB boundary for iseries_hv_alloc and iseries_hv_map */
> +	boundary_size = dma_get_seg_boundary_nr_pages(dev, tbl->it_page_shift);
>  
>  	n = iommu_area_alloc(tbl->it_map, limit, start, npages, tbl->it_offset,
> -			     boundary_size >> tbl->it_page_shift, align_mask);
> +			     boundary_size, align_mask);

This has changed the units of boundary_size, but it's unused elsewhere
in the function so that's OK.

If you need to do a v2 for any other reason, then I'd just drop
boundary_size and call dma_get_seg_boundary_nr_pages() directly in the
function call.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (powerpc)

cheers



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux