On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:06:26PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Just to check, has the skipping logic been tested to work equivalently > to what we had before? By inspection I think it should, but since it > relies on function call boundaries it always strikes me as fragile. > If you could confirm that (e.g. with LKDTM perhaps?) that'd be great. > Assuming that looks right, for the series: I've tested this with LKDTM and otherwise and didn't spot any issues (and just did a bit of retesting) but it is a pretty manual process so it's possible I missed something.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
