On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:36:50 +0200 Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [..] > > It seems now that the generalization is very well accepted so far, > apart from some apparent issues on arm. Also, merging 2 + 3 and > putting them first seems to be acceptable, so we could do that for > v3, if there are no objections. > > Of course, we first need to address the few remaining issues for > arm(32?), which do look quite confusing to me so far. BTW, sorry for > the compile error with patch 3, I guess we did the cross-compile only > for 1 + 2 applied, to see the bloat-o-meter changes. But I guess > patch 3 already proved its usefulness by that :-) Umm, replace "arm" with "power", sorry. No issues on arm so far, but also no ack I think. Thanks to Christophe for the power change, and to Mike for volunteering for some cross compilation and cross-arch testing. Will send v3 with merged and re-ordered patches after some more testing.
