Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Mittwoch, 19. März 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: >> x UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xf9dfc000 port 0xf9dfc200 >> >>> irq 315 >>> [ 38.125479] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xf9dfc000 port >>> 0xf9dfc280 irq 315 >>> [ 38.597035] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >>> [ 38.597732] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1600JS-00MHB1, 10.02E01, max >>> UDMA/133 [ 38.597775] ata1.00: 312581808 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 >>> [ 38.598405] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 >>> [ 39.069342] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >>> [ 39.084225] ata2.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD501LJ, CR100-12, max UDMA7 >>> [ 39.084264] ata2.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth >>> 0/32) [ 39.086268] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 >> So, just to confirm. With the updated patch, you don't see any problem, >> right? > > Correct. With the updated patch I don't see problems in 'non-raid' mode. AHCI > mode still has problems without nosmi. But that is an entirely different > problem, right? Yeap, can you please post the result of "lspci -nn"? -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
