Re: 2.6.24.X: SATA/AHCI related boot delay. - not with 2.6.24.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mittwoch, 19. März 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> x UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xf9dfc000 port 0xf9dfc200
>
> > irq 315
> > [   38.125479] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xf9dfc000 port
> > 0xf9dfc280 irq 315
> > [   38.597035] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> > [   38.597732] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1600JS-00MHB1, 10.02E01, max
> > UDMA/133 [   38.597775] ata1.00: 312581808 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
> > [   38.598405] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> > [   39.069342] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> > [   39.084225] ata2.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD501LJ, CR100-12, max UDMA7
> > [   39.084264] ata2.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth
> > 0/32) [   39.086268] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> So, just to confirm.  With the updated patch, you don't see any problem,
> right?

Correct. With the updated patch I don't see problems in 'non-raid' mode. AHCI 
mode still has problems without nosmi. But that is an entirely different 
problem, right?

Glück Auf,
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux