Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年5月14日周五 下午6:40写道： > > > > On 2021/5/14 下午5:47, yanteng si wrote: > > Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年5月14日周五 下午5:30写道： > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2021/5/14 下午5:09, yanteng si wrote: > >>> Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年5月14日周五 下午12:53写道： > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2021/5/14 上午12:18, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > >>>>>>> This patch translates Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst into Chinese. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> I fixed that typo too - it appears to originate from Alex...:) > >>>> > >>>> Sorry for the typo. > >>>> > >>>>> Actually, I've dropped this back out; it creates vast numbers of > >>>>> warnings: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Documentation/core-api/workqueue:398: ./include/linux/workqueue.h:3: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also > >>>>>> defined at translations/zh_CN/core-api/workqueue:3. > >>>>> This will be the result of the ".. kernel-doc::" directives at the end, > >>>>> which create new definitions (within sphinx) for all the symbols pulled > >>>>> in. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the long term, we may want to try to find some sort of fix for this. > >>>>> But we're really just recreating a bunch of (English-language) > >>>>> documentation that's already rendered once; I'm not sure it makes any > >>>>> real sense to do that. So I would suggest that, for now, when you are > >>>>> translating documents with kernel-doc directives, you should leave those > >>>>> directives out. Stick in a note directing readers to the original if > >>>>> they want to see that material... > >>>>> > >>>>> Make sense? > >>>> > >>>> Yes, it is a reasonable solution for now. > >>> OK, I will. > >>> I will remove them and then direct the reader to the original > >>> document. just like: > >>> > >>> .. note:: 抱歉，由于原始文档在此处交叉引用了代码中的注释，而现在并不是翻译这些注释的好时机（将会带来很多编译警告），所以请暂时浏览英文文档，链接在本文档顶部。 > >> > >> Jon said just remove kernel-doc, not all line? If so, don't need above explanation. > > just like: > > > > +列表管理函数 > > +============ > > + > > -+.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/list.h > > + include/linux/list.h > > I prefer sth like in this line, does this look fine? > > + check the functions in include/linux/list.h in kernel source code. Yes, it's fine! Thanks, Yanteng > > > + :internal: > > + > > +基本的C库函数 > > +============= > >> _< ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Yanteng > >
