Re: [PATCH v3] docs/zh_CN: add core-api workqueue.rst translation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2021/5/14 下午5:47, yanteng si wrote:
> Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年5月14日周五 下午5:30写道:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/5/14 下午5:09, yanteng si wrote:
>>> Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年5月14日周五 下午12:53写道:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2021/5/14 上午12:18, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>>>>>> This patch translates Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst into Chinese.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> I fixed that typo too - it appears to originate from Alex...:)
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the typo.
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, I've dropped this back out; it creates vast numbers of
>>>>> warnings:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Documentation/core-api/workqueue:398: ./include/linux/workqueue.h:3: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also
>>>>>> defined at translations/zh_CN/core-api/workqueue:3.
>>>>> This will be the result of the ".. kernel-doc::" directives at the end,
>>>>> which create new definitions (within sphinx) for all the symbols pulled
>>>>> in.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the long term, we may want to try to find some sort of fix for this.
>>>>> But we're really just recreating a bunch of (English-language)
>>>>> documentation that's already rendered once; I'm not sure it makes any
>>>>> real sense to do that.  So I would suggest that, for now, when you are
>>>>> translating documents with kernel-doc directives, you should leave those
>>>>> directives out.  Stick in a note directing readers to the original if
>>>>> they want to see that material...
>>>>>
>>>>> Make sense?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it is a reasonable solution for now.
>>> OK, I will.
>>> I will remove them and then direct the reader to the original
>>> document. just like:
>>>
>>> .. note:: 抱歉,由于原始文档在此处交叉引用了代码中的注释,而现在并不是翻译这些注释的好时机(将会带来很多编译警告),所以请暂时浏览英文文档,链接在本文档顶部。
>>
>> Jon said just remove kernel-doc, not all line? If so, don't need above explanation.
> just like:
> 
>  +列表管理函数
>  +============
>  +
> -+.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/list.h
> + include/linux/list.h

I prefer sth like in this line, does this look fine?

  + check the functions in include/linux/list.h in kernel source code.

>  +   :internal:
>  +
>  +基本的C库函数
>  +=============
>> _< ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yanteng
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux