Linux C Programming

• Thread Index

• Re: Getting resource usage informations of a process
  • From: Tassilo Horn <heimdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Getting resource usage informations of a process
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Serial Reading
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Getting resource usage informations of a process
  • From: Tassilo Horn <heimdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Serial Reading
  • From: Mihai Dontu <mdontu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Serial Reading
  • From: ronaldo.afonso@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Kernel Functions
  • From: "Gvks Satish-A14577" <satish.k@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: Progga <abulfazl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What means "\xc7\x44\x24\x18\xda\xff\xff\xff\xe8" ?
  • From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What means "\xc7\x44\x24\x18\xda\xff\xff\xff\xe8" ?
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• How can found a hiden module?
  • From: "openbsd shen" <openbsd.shen@xxxxxxxxx>
• What means "\xc7\x44\x24\x18\xda\xff\xff\xff\xe8" ?
  • From: "openbsd shen" <openbsd.shen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH
  • From: Rebelde <jrsilva2k@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error caused by case of filename extension
  • From: "Markus Rechberger" <mrechberger@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: "Holy Aavu" <holyaavu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Startup function before main.
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Startup function before main.
  • From: <krishna.vamsi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Startup function before main.
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Startup function before main.
  • From: "Uday Karan" <uday.karan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Startup function before main.
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: "Holy Aavu" <holyaavu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Startup function before main.
  • From: <krishna.vamsi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need for const in function argument list
  • From: Yorgos Pagles <pagles@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Mikado <mikado4vn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Read /dev/kmem failed
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Read /dev/kmem failed
  • From: Mikado <mikado4vn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Mikado <mikado4vn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need for const in function argument list
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing a class' member functions
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need for const in function argument list
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Integer arithmetic vs double precision arithmetic
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need for const in function argument list
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing a class' member functions
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing a class' member functions
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need for const in function argument list
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Need for const in function argument list
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing a class' member functions
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Accessing a class' member functions
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: "Anderson Lizardo" <anderson.lizardo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Mikado <mikado4vn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Virtual Serial Port
  • From: Mikado <mikado4vn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error caused by case of filename extension
  • From: B S Srinidhi <srinidhi-c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compile error caused by case of filename extension
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Runtime memory organization for a process
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Runtime memory organization for a process
  • From: "Shrikanth Ramanath" <shriek.007@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual functions and destructors
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual functions and destructors
  • From: Benjamin Sobotta <mayday@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual functions and destructors
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const int f() and int f() const
  • From: Benjamin Sobotta <mayday@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual functions and destructors
  • From: Benjamin Sobotta <mayday@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Read /dev/kmem failed
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Debugging ephemeris code
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Read /dev/kmem failed
  • From: "openbsd shen" <openbsd.shen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Debugging ephemeris code
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Syntax of constructor
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const int f() and int f() const
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Syntax of constructor
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Syntax of constructor
  • From: "Uday Karan" <uday.karan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Syntax of constructor
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const int f() and int f() const
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const int f() and int f() const
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Virtual functions and destructors
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const int f() and int f() const
  • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const int f() and int f() const
  • From: "ab" <abulfazl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Virtual functions and destructors
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• const int f() and int f() const
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: amd64 :: SIGABRT in malloc()
  • From: B S Srinidhi <srinidhi-c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: amd64 :: SIGABRT in malloc()
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: amd64 :: SIGABRT in malloc()
  • From: <krishna.vamsi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: amd64 :: SIGABRT in malloc()
  • From: B S Srinidhi <srinidhi-c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: amd64 :: SIGABRT in malloc()
  • From: Mihai Dontu <mdontu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• amd64 :: SIGABRT in malloc()
  • From: B S Srinidhi <srinidhi-c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: Tomas Janousek <tomi@xxxxxxx>
• Re: How to detect if screensaver is active
  • From: zavandi <zavandi@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to detect if screensaver is active
  • From: zavandi <zavandi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a problem about send() on socket programming
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• a problem about send() on socket programming
  • From: "Xueting Zhu" <zxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: Vamsi <krishna.vamsi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• what does sendto() return?
  • From: "朱雪婷" <zxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: "Joel M. Pareja" <jpareja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: Vamsi <krishna.vamsi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: "Joel M. Pareja" <jpareja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Significance of using + before function calls.
  • From: Vamsi <krishna.vamsi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Speaker Sound
  • From: Progga <abulfazl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Speaker Sound
  • From: Alan Bryan <icemanind@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function call
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on SIGSEGV / Stack growth
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function call
  • From: wwp <subscript@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Function call
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Function call
  • From: Honnavalli_Sreevathsa@xxxxxxx
• Question on SIGSEGV / Stack growth
  • From: "Gvks Satish-A14577" <satish.k@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function call
  • From: wwp <subscript@xxxxxxx>
• Function call
  • From: "Subbulakshmi Sadagopal (RBIN/EDS2) *" <Subbulakshmi.S@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A safe scanf function
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A safe scanf function
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A safe scanf function
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making "make" auto-strip and auto-clean
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A safe scanf function
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pointer arithmetic vs. arrays
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making "make" auto-strip and auto-clean
  • From: leslie.polzer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Making "make" auto-strip and auto-clean
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making "make" auto-strip and auto-clean
  • From: wwp <subscript@xxxxxxx>
• A safe scanf function
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Making "make" auto-strip and auto-clean
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• pointer arithmetic vs. arrays
  • From: James Colannino <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: argv[0]
  • From: a.biardi@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: X Clipboard programming
  • From: Peter Song <psong.deepthunk@xxxxxxxxx>
• X Clipboard programming
  • From: James Colannino <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "strip"-ping Windows executables
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• "strip"-ping Windows executables
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disadvantage of using long long int
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disadvantage of using long long int
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disadvantage of using long long int
  • From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disadvantage of using long long int
  • From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Disadvantage of using long long int
  • From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>