Linux Arch
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [GIT PULL urgent-membarrier] membarrier commits for 4.14
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 02/15] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 04/15] locking/rwsem: Remove kernel/locking/rwsem.h
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 05/15] locking/rwsem: Move rwsem internal function declarations to rwsem-xadd.h
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 08/15] locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 09/15] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return a tri-state value
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 07/15] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 06/15] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 11/15] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem_wake spinlock optimization
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 10/15] locking/rwsem: Enable count-based spinning on reader
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 13/15] locking/rwsem: Improve fairness to writers
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 12/15] locking/rwsem: Eliminate redundant writer wakeup calls
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 14/15] locking/rwsem: Make waiting writer to optimistically spin for the lock
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 15/15] locking/rwsem: Wake up all readers in wait queue
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 03/15] locking/rwsem: Move owner setting code from rwsem.c to rwsem-xadd.h
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 01/15] locking/rwsem: relocate rwsem_down_read_failed()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH-tip v7 00/15] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3.16.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3.2.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3.10.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3.16.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4.1.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4.4.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] bpf: Don't check for current being NULL
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] bpf: Don't check for current being NULL
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [Part1 PATCH v6 15/17] percpu: Introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH resend] asm-generic: don't #include <linux/atomic.h> in qspinlock_types.h
- From: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH tip/sched/membarrier 1/5] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH tip/sched/membarrier 3/5] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH tip/sched/membarrier 2/5] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH tip/sched/membarrier 5/5] Fix: membarrier: Handle CLONE_VM + !CLONE_THREAD correctly on powerpc
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH tip/sched/membarrier 4/5] membarrier: Remove unused code for architectures without membarrier hooks
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2 membarrier/urgent] membarrier commits for 4.14
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 03/11] locking/rwsem: Move owner setting code from rwsem.c to rwsem-xadd.h
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 01/11] locking/rwsem: relocate rwsem_down_read_failed()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 04/11] locking/rwsem: Remove kernel/locking/rwsem.h
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 06/11] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 07/11] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 08/11] locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 09/11] locking/rwsem: Enable time-based reader lock stealing
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 05/11] locking/rwsem: Move rwsem internal function declarations to rwsem-xadd.h
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 11/11] locking/rwsem: Enable count-based spinning on reader
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 10/11] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return a tri-state value
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 00/11] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support
- From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 08/28] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set, clear}_ti_thread_flag()
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 04/28] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv
- From: Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/15] Remove to-be-unneeded smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/15] Remove to-be-unneeded smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4.9 080/105] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4.13 112/160] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v3 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v3 28/28] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 08/28] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set,clear}_ti_thread_flag()
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 04/28] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 00/28] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE)
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/15] netfilter: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/15] percpu: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/15] tracepoint: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comment
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/15] percpu: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] bitfield: Use __ffs64(x) to fix missing __ffsdi2()
- From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/15] percpu: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/15] netfilter: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] bitfield: Use __ffs64(x) to fix missing __ffsdi2()
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/15] tracepoint: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comment
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/15] tracepoint: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comment
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/15] tracepoint: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comment
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/15] percpu: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/15] keyring: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/15] doc: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/15] seqlock: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/15] locking: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/15] netfilter: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/15] mm/ksm: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/15] rtnetlink: Update now-misleading smp_read_barrier_depends() comment
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/15] drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed: Fix __qed_spq_block() ordering
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/15] mn10300: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/15] fs/dcache: Use release-acquire for name/length update
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/15] uprobes: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Adjust read-side accessor comments for READ_ONCE()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/15] Remove to-be-unneeded smp_read_barrier_depends()
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] bitfield: Use __ffs64(x) to fix missing __ffsdi2()
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] bitfield: Use __ffs64(x) to fix missing __ffsdi2()
- From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] bitfield: Use __ffs64(x) to fix missing __ffsdi2()
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] bitfield: Use __ffs64(x) to fix missing __ffsdi2()
- From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] bitfield: Use __ffs64(x) to fix missing __ffsdi2()
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3] membarrier: provide core serialization
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [renesas:topic/rcar-gen3-z-clk-v3 2/6] rcar-gen3-cpg.c:undefined reference to `__ffsdi2'
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [renesas:topic/rcar-gen3-z-clk-v3 2/6] rcar-gen3-cpg.c:undefined reference to `__ffsdi2'
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.14 1/2] membarrier: Remove unused code for architectures without membarrier hooks
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3] membarrier: provide core serialization
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.14 1/2] membarrier: Remove unused code for architectures without membarrier hooks
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3] membarrier: provide core serialization
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH for 4.14 1/2] membarrier: Remove unused code for architectures without membarrier hooks
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v2 for 4.14 2/2] Fix: membarrier: Handle CLONE_VM + !CLONE_THREAD correctly on powerpc
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.14 2/2] Fix: membarrier: Handle CLONE_VM + !CLONE_THREAD correctly on powerpc
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH for 4.14 2/2] Fix: membarrier: Handle CLONE_VM + !CLONE_THREAD correctly on powerpc
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH for 4.14 1/2] membarrier: Remove unused code for architectures without membarrier hooks
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL membarrier/urgent] membarrier commits for 4.14
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 02/29] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0
- From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH REBASED 0/6] rwsem: Implement down_read_killable()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Regression: x86/mm: Add Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Regression: x86/mm: Add Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support
- Re: [PATCH v5 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH REBASED 0/6] rwsem: Implement down_read_killable()
- From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH REBASED 1/6] alpha: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH REBASED 2/6] ia64: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH REBASED 4/6] x86: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH REBASED 5/6] rwsem: Add down_read_killable()
- From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH REBASED 6/6] fs: Use killable down_read() in iterate_dir()
- From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable()
- From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 15/17] percpu: Introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH for 4.14] membarrier powerpc: Move hook to switch_mm()
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Michael Cree <mcree@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes
- From: Richard Ruigrok <rruigrok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [tip:locking/core] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Enable CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT
- From: tip-bot for Kees Cook <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx>
- [tip:locking/core] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: tip-bot for Kees Cook <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes
- From: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: page_vma_mapped: Ensure pmd is loaded with READ_ONCE outside of lock
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [Part1 PATCH v5 15/17] percpu: Introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH for 4.14 2/3] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 for 4.14 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Christopher Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv2] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Christopher Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] asm-generic: Drop getrlimit and setrlimit syscalls from default list
- From: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] 32-bit userspace ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option
- From: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] compat ABI: use non-compat openat and open_by_handle_at variants
- From: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] arch: improvenemts for new ABIs
- From: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 0/9] Application Data Integrity feature introduced by SPARC M7
- From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 2/9] mm, swap: Add infrastructure for saving page metadata as well on swap
- From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 1/9] signals, sparc: Add signal codes for ADI violations
- From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm/mprotect, powerpc/mm/pkeys, x86/mm/pkeys: Add sysfs interface
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arch: remove unused *_segments() macros/functions
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arch: remove unused *_segments() macros/functions
- From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey
- From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm: display pkey in smaps if arch_pkeys_enabled() is true
- From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm: display pkey in smaps if arch_pkeys_enabled() is true
- From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm/mprotect, powerpc/mm/pkeys, x86/mm/pkeys: Add sysfs interface
- From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 5/7] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be]{_lo_hi|_hi_lo} macros
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 2/7] powerpc: io.h: move iomap.h include so that it can use readq/writeq defs
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 4/7] iomap: introduce io{read|write}64_{lo_hi|hi_lo}
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 3/7] powerpc: iomap.c: introduce io{read|write}64_{lo_hi|hi_lo}
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 1/7] drm/tilcdc: ensure nonatomic iowrite64 is not used
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 0/7] make io{read|write}64 globally usable
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 7/7] crypto: caam: cleanup CONFIG_64BIT ifdefs when using io{read|write}64
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 6/7] ntb: ntb_hw_intel: use io-64-nonatomic instead of in-driver hacks
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Rough notes from sys_membarrier() lightning BoF
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] mm, x86, powerpc: Memory Protection Keys enhancement
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] mm, x86 : introduce arch_pkeys_enabled()
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] mm/mprotect, powerpc/mm/pkeys, x86/mm/pkeys: Add sysfs interface
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] mm: display pkey in smaps if arch_pkeys_enabled() is true
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] Documentation/vm: PowerPC specific updates to memory protection keys
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] Documentation/x86: Move protecton key documentation to arch neutral directory
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations
- From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv3 08/11] sparc64: update pmdp_invalidate to return old pmd value
- From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv3 11/11] mm: Use updated pmdp_invalidate() interface to track dirty/accessed bits
- From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 02/11] arc: Use generic_pmdp_establish as pmdp_establish
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 01/11] asm-generic: Provide generic_pmdp_establish()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 06/11] powerpc/mm: update pmdp_invalidate to return old pmd value
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 03/11] arm/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 07/11] s390/mm: Modify pmdp_invalidate to return old value.
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 04/11] arm64: Provide pmdp_establish() helper
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 05/11] mips: Use generic_pmdp_establish as pmdp_establish
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 08/11] sparc64: update pmdp_invalidate to return old pmd value
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 09/11] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 00/11] Do not loose dirty bit on THP pages
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 10/11] mm: Do not loose dirty and access bits in pmdp_invalidate()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv3 11/11] mm: Use updated pmdp_invalidate() interface to track dirty/accessed bits
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] openrisc: add forward declaration for struct vm_area_struct
- From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] openrisc: add forward declaration for struct vm_area_struct
- From: Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] openrisc: add forward declaration for struct vm_area_struct
- From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] namespace updates for 4.14-rc1
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: module: use relative references for __ksymtab entries
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: module: use relative references for __ksymtab entries
- From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: module: use relative references for __ksymtab entries
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] openrisc: add forward declaration for struct vm_area_struct
- From: Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] openrisc: add forward declaration for struct vm_area_struct
- From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h
- From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: "Okamoto, Takayuki" <tokamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- LPC Linux Kernel Memory Workshop next week!
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting CPU clock frequency on early boot
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: "Okamoto, Takayuki" <tokamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting CPU clock frequency on early boot
- From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting CPU clock frequency on early boot
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting CPU clock frequency on early boot
- From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting CPU clock frequency on early boot
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting CPU clock frequency on early boot
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Setting CPU clock frequency on early boot
- From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h
- From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h
- From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -tip 2/4] arm: Cleanup in_exception_text() and move it in asm/sections.h
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -tip 2/4] arm: Cleanup in_exception_text() and move it in asm/sections.h
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Enable CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 02/28] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0
- From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/7] Remove the parent_node() for each arch
- From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 7/7] asm-generic: numa: Remove the unused parent_node() macro
- From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v2 28/28] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v2 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/28] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/28] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set,clear}_ti_thread_flag()
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/28] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE)
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 02/28] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 02/28] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0
- From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb.c: make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 02/28] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 3/3] sched: depend on 64BIT_ATOMIC_ACCESS to determine if to use min_vruntime_copy
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC 1/3] arch: add 64BIT_ATOMIC_ACCESS to support 64bit atomic access on 32bit machines
- From: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 3/3] sched: depend on 64BIT_ATOMIC_ACCESS to determine if to use min_vruntime_copy
- From: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 2/3] arm: enable 64BIT_ATOMIC(_ALIGNED)_ACCESS on LPAE enabled machines
- From: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 0/3] add 64BIT_ATOMIC_ACCESS and 64BIT_ATOMIC_ALIGNED_ACCESS
- From: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/27] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/27] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 13/27] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 13/27] arm64/sve: Signal handling support
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86/ioapic: Correctly print IRTE's index field when enabling INTR
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: struct pt_regs missing in /usr/include/ tree for eBPF program compile
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be]{_lo_hi|_hi_lo} macros
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] ntb: ntb_hw_intel: use io-64-nonatomic instead of in-driver hacks
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v6 35/62] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation
- From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] make io{read|write}64 globally usable
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] ntb: ntb_hw_intel: use io-64-nonatomic instead of in-driver hacks
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be]{_lo_hi|_hi_lo} macros
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] make io{read|write}64 globally usable
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] ntb: ntb_hw_intel: use io-64-nonatomic instead of in-driver hacks
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be]{_lo_hi|_hi_lo} macros
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/27] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 6/7] ntb: ntb_hw_intel: use io-64-nonatomic instead of in-driver hacks
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 0/7] make io{read|write}64 globally usable
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 7/7] crypto: caam: cleanup CONFIG_64BIT ifdefs when using io{read|write}64
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 1/7] drm/tilcdc: ensure nonatomic iowrite64 is not used
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 5/7] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be]{_lo_hi|_hi_lo} macros
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 3/7] powerpc: iomap.c: introduce io{read|write}64_{lo_hi|hi_lo}
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 4/7] iomap: introduce io{read|write}64_{lo_hi|hi_lo}
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 2/7] powerpc: io.h: move iomap.h include so that it can use readq/writeq defs
- From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/27] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] x86/ioapic: Correctly print IRTE's index field when enabling INTR
- From: raymond pang <raymondpangxd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/27] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb.c: make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour
- From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/27] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: mm: abort uaccess retries upon fatal signal
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fatal signal handing within uaccess faults
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb.c: make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: abort uaccess retries upon fatal signal
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb.c: make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour
- From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb.c: make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] devicetree: cleanup and improve DT cross-arch reference
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/27] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: abort uaccess retries upon fatal signal
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/27] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/27] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
- From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [tip:core/rcu] arch: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions
- From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 4.14
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] devicetree: cleanup and improve DT cross-arch reference
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v6 35/62] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH v3 1/5] arch: enable relative relocations for arm64, power, x86, s390 and x86
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/5] init: allow initcall tables to be emitted using relative references
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/5] drivers: pci: add support for relative addressing in quirk tables
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Netdev]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]