On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:48:13PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:42:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Hello! > > > > The prototype patch shown below provides files required to allow herd7 to > > evaluate C-language litmus tests for the multicopy-atomic TSO ordering > > provided by s390. > > There really isn't anything s390 specific here is there? That is, would > this not equally work for x86 and sparc, both of which are similarly TSO > ? As I understand it, there is a difference. The difference from TSO systems such as x86 is that s390 is multicopy atomic as well as TSO. In contrast, x86 is TSO as well as other-multicopy-atomic. I must defer to Martin and Christian for details -- this should be interpreted as a feeble first attempt on my part, not any sort of IBM-approved definition of s390. ;-) > Given that, should this not be called TSO instead of s390 ? I agree completely with a single tso.cfg, TSO.cfg, or whatever name, as opposed to a bunch of identical files for x86, SPARC, ... Thanx, Paul
