Dear Jacques, please accept my apologizes for appearing harsh. I appreciate really your efforts. I didn't want to start a quarrel either. Though I am not a beginner in bash programming i have to admit, that I didn't really have a thorough look on the script. You are absolutely right. I recently installed SuSe 11.4 on the mentioned machine. A few months ago the machine had access to broadband, so modem was not really necessary. But anyway I think, just in case it is good, when modems work. I will check the USB-libraries. Scanner and some other external devices work, but who kows? Best regards Bernd Jacques Goldberg schrieb: > Dear Bernd, > > > I am not trying to criticize what you do, nor do I wish to start a > quarrel. > > I want to make my best to help you and find where your problem is > located. > > This is exceedingly easy while being "hands on" the computer, and > exceedingly difficult while being limited to the information supplied > by the person in trouble, > > Here is your log with my comments flagged by leading >>> > > bernd@LRK:~/src/slmodem-2.9.11-20110321> sudo winmodusb > Running modprobe ungrab-winmodem > DONE > > >>> because of bash syntax error ( = in a test must have a space on > its left and a space on its right, both missing in your winusb, the > >>>output of the test is always TRUE thus your DONE does not prove > that this modprobe was "done". > > Running modprobe slusb > > >>>this one too ens with a misleading DONE (below, near the end) for > the same reason. No PROOF that slusb was loaded > > >>>the following command was probably typed by you while waiting for > your script to end, unfortunately you did not quote who >>>introduced > it (it is NOT in the script, which is why I risk a GUESS that it was > introduced by you. > > insmod /lib/modules/2.6.37.1-1.2-default/extra/slusb.ko > > >>>and you killed your script winmodusb while it was active at line > 17, but clearly modprobe -v slusb was never completed' > > /home/bernd/bin/winmodusb: Zeile 17: 7953 Getötet > modprobe -v slusb > > >>> A few line below you get a comforting DONE (due to a programming > error in the script) which makes you believe that slusb was >>> loaded > into memory ... , unfortunately you did not check its presence in > memory after your insmod command > > >>> as you should do by lsmod|grep slsub instead of a line in a > script. > > > >>> now plenty of system messages some but not necessarily all > occurring during the failing modprobe > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > > kernel:[ 441.892465] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > kernel:[ 441.892472] last sysfs file: /sys/module/usbcore/initstate > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > kernel:[ 441.892655] Process modprobe (pid: 7953, ti=ea64a000 > task=e54bee30 task.ti=ea64a000) > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > kernel:[ 441.892661] Stack: > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > kernel:[ 441.892704] Call Trace: > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > kernel:[ 441.893068] Code: 28 00 00 00 00 0f 88 9e 03 00 00 8b 44 24 > 14 03 44 24 18 89 44 24 10 73 12 8b 54 24 14 c7 44 24 10 ff ff ff ff > f7 d2 89 54 24 18 <0f> b6 06 8b 5c 24 14 84 c0 74 7c 8d 54 24 24 89 f0 > e8 51 ea ff > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > kernel:[ 441.893123] EIP: [<c03f8fc9>] vsnprintf+0x49/0x400 SS:ESP > 0068:ea64bd54 > > Message from syslogd@LRK at May 20 20:24:29 ... > kernel:[ 441.893135] CR2: 0000000000000000 > > >>>the second misleading DONE from the script > > DONE > > Making node /dev/slusb0 > > >>>The node correctly created > > Running slmodemd -c GERMANY /dev/slusb0 & > bernd@LRK:~/src/slmodem-2.9.11-20110321> error: mdm setup: cannot open > dev `/dev/slusb0': No such device or address > error: cannot setup device `/dev/slusb0' > >>>and the final message that slmodem cannot start because slusb has > not been loaded in the memory. > bernd@LRK:~/src/slmodem-2.9.11-20110321> > > >>>> > > > Please always remember that Linux is a true multitasking system, > several commands can run simultaneously, and the order in which output > messages appear is independent of the order in which the commands were > submitted, unless you carefully wait for the completion of each > command before giving the next. Specially when sleep's are introduced > in a script. > > > Which is why I humbly tried to discourage you from using scripts for > debugging purposes. > > > I am sorry for these bad news but you are still before slusb has > successfully been loaded. > > I have a bet (educated bet, from the System messages) but it is no > more than a bet. > > You have a wrong set of USB libraries in your machine, older or newer > than what the code in slusb assumes. > > > Jacques > > > On 05/22/2011 03:21 PM, Bernd Weber wrote: > >> Hi Jacques, >> >> this script worked fine for the other Linux-Versions. So I saw no >> necessity to debug it. >> Besides, the error is caused by the "modprobe -v slusb" - command, >> executed by the script. >> >> Of course I had read the README-file in the tarball. It is of little >> use. There is nothing said about the option USB=1, for example. >> I don't simply follow the instructions in the README, because they don't >> just work. >> I saw the mistakes in the script now. They are of little importance for >> the failure I described, because the essential commands as ungrab and >> modprobe slusb are executed nevertheless. >> In the script: >> modprobe ungrab-winmodem >> modprobe -v slusb >> mknod -m 600 /dev/slusb0 c 242 0 >> >> As you can see, in the essential lines you don't have a confusion >> between node, or module. The insertion of the compiled module just >> throws an exception. After that the USV-Port was blocked, so I had to >> reboot my computer tp get my external USB-Drive to be recognized again >> at that Port. >> >> >> As I remember I got the script from the technion site some years ago. >> Because it worked I saw no need to debug it. >> >> Greetings >> >> Bernd >> >> Jacques Goldberg schrieb: >>> Bernd, >>> >>> >>> Whoever the author of the script which you used, winmodusb, you should >>> not use it. Instead of debugging your modem driver, this turns into >>> debugging a script which does anything else than what the author >>> intended it to do. The script as you sent it is full of mistake, >>> such as >>> quotes where back quotes are meant, slusb0 (a device) confused with >>> slusb (a program), and more. >>> >>> I know it is tiring to type again and again a sequence of commands. >>> >>> Why would you not simply follow the instructions in the README file of >>> the tarball which you used? >>> >>> I did it on an 32 bits laptop which unfortunately does not have the >>> right Smartllink or compatible modem but a Conexant, and everything >>> went >>> smooth until slmodemd tried to start the wrong modem. >>> >>> >>> By the way at least while debugging, running slmodemd in the background >>> may become a cause of headache as the simple way to stop a session >>> is by >>> killing slmodemd with CTRL-C. >>> >>> >>> My former remark about powering the modem is not in conflict with your >>> previous usage of the modem with an other computer and/or another >>> version of Linux. Simply, we have seen here more than a handful of >>> users >>> not understanding why the driver would not start, because they had >>> forgotten to power up their external modem. The pseudodevice such as >>> /dev/slusb0 will not exist if the modem is not connected and powered, >>> because the system then does not know about its existence. I have made >>> the mistake enough times myself to have thought of that as a possible >>> cause of your troubles. >>> >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> On 05/20/2011 10:26 PM, Bernd Weber wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Antoni, hi Jacquea, >>>> >>>> thank you very much. I forgot that depmod thing. This was the best way >>>> to come to the next errors. Please find attached what the syslogd said >>>> and the shell-script I used to activate the modem. >>>> >>>> Besides: the modem was powered and is O.K. I know this, because I >>>> use it >>>> on another machine with SuSe 10.2. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Bernd >>>> >>>> Jacques Goldberg schrieb: >>>>> On 05/20/2011 04:56 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Bernd, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Bernd Weber<weber.bernd@xxxxxxxx> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Antonio, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thank you for the link. The slusb.ko is compiled now. But a "make >>>>>>> install" only installs the slamr.ko into the >>>>>>> /lib/modules/kernel/extra-directory. Even when I copy the module >>>>>>> manually, modprobe doesen't find the module: >>>>>>> modprobe slusb >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have any ideas? >>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>> of course with the modem connected and powered up, something >>>>> which might have been skipped while fighting with the software... >>>>>> # depmod -a >>>>>> or >>>>>> $ sudo depmod -a >>>>>> then >>>>>> $ sudo modprobe slusb >>>>>> or >>>>>> # modprobe slusb >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bernd >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Antonio Olivares schrieb: >>>>>>>> Bernd, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please check the following pages out: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg883918.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg883985.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg884183.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Check them out and see if you can get it working on your system? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Bernd Weber<weber.bernd@xxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Antonio, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thanks a lot. This option carried me a step further - to the next >>>>>>>>> error. >>>>>>>>> Please find enclosed the compilation and the error-log as well. >>>>>>>>> In the tar-ball enclosed are different patch-file. But there >>>>>>>>> is no >>>>>>>>> documentation to what file or files these shold be applied and in >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>> cases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bernd >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Antonio Olivares schrieb: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bernd, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Try to use a special command make USB=1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> $ sudo make USB=1 >>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>> $ make USB=1 >>>>>>>>>> the slusb as well as the slamr driver will be compiled. Try >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> report back. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Bernd >>>>>>>>>> Weber<weber.bernd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am using a 32-bits machine. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the URL: >>>>>>>>>>> http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/smartlink/slmodem-2.9.11-20110321.tar.gz >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My steps: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> tar xzvf slmodem-2.9.11-20110321.tar.gz >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>>> make install >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And then I learned that slusb.ko wasn't compiled. I couldn't >>>>>>>>>>> find the >>>>>>>>>>> reason. On some pages I got hints that there might be problems >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>> kernels later than 2.6.24. >>>>>>>>>>> May be I should have done further configuration efforts for >>>>>>>>>>> slusb. But I >>>>>>>>>>> didn't find hints what I should do. So I have the choice to >>>>>>>>>>> experiment a >>>>>>>>>>> few days or ask questions ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Greetings Bernd >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques Goldberg schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bernd, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please give us the URL of the file which compiled slamr and >>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>> slusb - I just would like to give it a try on my machine >>>>>>>>>>>> (because I had the necessary hardware in my office, I happend >>>>>>>>>>>> to watch >>>>>>>>>>>> Sacha, the author of the drivers, compiling and testing them , >>>>>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>>> am curious to see what fails and where) >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, are you using a 32 bits or a 64 bits machine? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/19/2011 05:50 PM, Bernd Weber wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the last kernel slusb worked with was 2.6.18.2-34-default, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Suse 10.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> with slmodem-2.9.10. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I compiled the latest version on SuSe 11.4. But slusb wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> compiled, >>>>>>>>>>>>> only slamr. I tediously searched the site of linmodem, but >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't find >>>>>>>>>>>>> an answer whats to do. SuSe 11.4 comes with kernel 2.6.37 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Modem in question is a Fujitsu Siemens USB-Modem. >>>>>>>>>>>>> As I said, it works fine with older kernels and older >>>>>>>>>>>>> Versions of >>>>>>>>>>>>> slmodem. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is some programming to be done, please let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Though I am >>>>>>>>>>>>> much better in Perl than in C/C++, if necessary I would >>>>>>>>>>>>> try to >>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the >>>>>>>>>>>>> problems. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could somebody give me a short briefing? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Greetings >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bernd >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >
