Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> My impression from the regular
>> plenary reports on attendance my impression is > that the number of
>> people involved in the IETF is declining, yet the number > of RFCs
>> being processed is going up.
>>
>> > Attendance is perhaps declining, but I don't recall any discussion
>> of > WG email traffic, for example.
>>
>> So the number we need to know is what is the trend for RFCs being
>> processed by a set of authors who are exclusively remote. ...
> Why exclusively?
There is a belief that documents which have authors that can travel to
meetings progress more easily than those that don't.
A document that has at least one author "shopping" the document around the
physical meeting could have five remote authors contributing.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
