Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps RFCs could list (within the document) who reviewed/approved
> them, and in which role/capacity the review had been performed.
+10.
> This could serve two purposes:
> - some minimal reward for those individuals taking the time to review the document,
> - encouragement for the reviewers to ensure that an adequate review has been performed based on the role/capacity in which they are acting.
I've also suggested that the XML for the acknowledgement section be
structured so that we could extract this information better.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
