> On 6 Nov 2019, at 14:38, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > >> Perhaps RFCs could list (within the document) who reviewed/approved them, and in which role/capacity the review had been performed. >> >> This could serve two purposes: >> - some minimal reward for those individuals taking the time to review the document, >> - encouragement for the reviewers to ensure that an adequate review has been performed based on the role/capacity in which they are acting. > > I think I like this idea, but also, speaking for myself I would refuse > to review a few more documents of things that are too far out of my > area of expertise (which might be a good or bad thing, depending on > whether anyone else steps up) > > Paul > I learn a lot from the out of area drafts that I get asked to review. - Stewart
