Hi, > On Nov 6, 2019, at 7:28 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Perhaps RFCs could list (within the document) who reviewed/approved >> them, and in which role/capacity the review had been performed. > > +10. > >> This could serve two purposes: >> - some minimal reward for those individuals taking the time to review the document, >> - encouragement for the reviewers to ensure that an adequate review has been performed based on the role/capacity in which they are acting. > > I've also suggested that the XML for the acknowledgement section be > structured so that we could extract this information better. All of this (reviewers, Shepard, AD reviews, ballots, etc.) is captured in the datatracker currently. I am not sure why it would also need to be in the document. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
