Hi again, Andy. > You haven't yet addressed the point that Warren and I both made that > you should remove the word "current" from the draft. Right. I'm cogitating. - I believe is is helpful to document what my procedures will be. - I agree that it could be a burden/disruption for a future ISE to have to individually update this and any other similar RFCs to explain that they also apply (although, they might do that in a simple way). - I agree that a future ISE could change any policy by writing a new RFC. My concern is that I don't want to set policies for the Independent Stream (and in this Ben is right that I don't want to formally update 4846). Rather, I want to document how I am operating. Thanks, Adrian -- Adrian Farrel (ISE), rfc-ise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
