Re: Should IETF stop using GitHub?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Saturday, August 3, 2019 16:18 -0400 "Joel M. Halpern"
<jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 8/3/2019 4:10 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> i think that wg charters should mandate emacs. :)
>> 
>> we have a variety of tools, a variety of people, and a
>> variety of needs. there are no perfect tools, perfect people
>> (present company excepted, of course), and unsophisticated
>> needs do not match our unbounded desire for corner cases.
>> 
>> we have a work-product funnel with a fairly wide mouth and a
>> well- defined end.  this is a feature, not a bug.
>> 
>> i use nekked git, gogs, github, and still a remnant of RCS
>> <blush>.  i use emacs and xml2rfc.  i do not feel a need to
>> tell you what [not] to use; and will not take seriously your
>> telling me what [not] to use. it's hard enough to get
>> substantive work done without being over-processed and/or
>> micromanaged.
>> 
>> i recently co-authored a draft where a major contributor
>> still uses nroff.  i focussed on the content, and only
>> snarked once.
>> 
>> and i deeply appreciate the tool-makers who have given us a
>> fairly rich variety from which to choose.  and i am in awe of
>> the makers and fellow users who help when i do a st00pid or
>> hit a bug.  thank you.
>> 
>> randy
>> 
>> 
> 
> Well said.
> Joel

Indeed.  Excellent discussion and summary.
   john





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux