On 7/20/19 8:59 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 8:51 AM Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe your statement of intent. But I think it's fair to realize
that there is already tremendous pressure to deploy implementations
before they've been formally approved, and there's a danger that any
kind of distinguished "mark" will have the (unintended) effect of
promoting deployment of the marked version of a protocol.
regardless of 'published or not' folk will always push for the early
implementation of FOO before it has been 'ratified'.
it's pretty clear that this happens, and that nothing about this
discussion is going to change that.
The last part does not follow.
Keith
