> The practice I've seen (when I was on the IESG) was for the IESG > to seek out, and properly handle, community comment on draft versions > of (I think all) IESG statements or policies. I think that's a fine > thing to do, and keep doing. I think an IESG that stopped doing that > would be making a significant mistake, and one that could take quite > a while to repair via nomcom, so hopefully the IESG don't make that > mistake (I'm confident that they won't). kobe
