On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:13 AM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>With the new policy, if someone signals that they don't want to be photographed, and you photograph them repeatedly, they can
>complain to the ombudsperson. Without this policy, they can't. Seems really straightforward to me. This "shoving the
>camera in the face" thing isn't mentioned in the policy, so I don't know why you keep talking about it.
I would hope that with or without the new policy, if I were to tell
someone "don't take my picture" and it took it anyway, the
ombudsentity would take an interesst if asked.
Hi John,
Leaving aside the official photographer, from my perspective the primary difference between what you have said above and the individual-facing part of the policy is to have a way to signal that you don't want to photographed without having to say it to everyone individually. Can you help me understand why you feel that makes a big difference in a way that (I think) you object to?
-Ekr
