With the "tried-and-proven policies" being compromises and having had similar discussions with differing views just like we're having here. And, those policies came about to solve an entirely different problem (specific to women AFAICT) than the one that has been used as the example here, which is equally applicable to men. I asked Ekr if he had read the background as to why the other groups developed their policies, so I'll ask you the same question? And, these policies were developed by groups that also do not have the amount of video recording as part of their usual meetings. So, the notion that what other groups have done is an ideal and obvious fit for IETF dismisses a lot of key points that people have raised.
Regards,
Mary.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/5/18 03:46, John C Klensin wrote:
We usually manage to demonstrate
that few IETF participants have the background or experience to
make good policies in areas that have significant social or
legal implications
For what it's worth (and at the risk of beating this horse when it's already down), this is mitigated by the fact that the proposed policy is modeled on tried-and-proven policies used by other groups.
/a
